Key result
Coronary CT angiography demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for significant CAD in valve surgery patients, with a pooled sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 88-93%) and specificity of 88% (95% CI 84-91%).
Why the study?
To investigate the diagnostic performance of CCTA for assessing significant CAD in patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement or TAVI/TAVR, using ICA as the reference standard.
Does coronary CT angiography accurately diagnose significant coronary artery disease compared to invasive coronary angiography in patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement or TAVI?
Meta-Analysis
Does coronary CT angiography accurately diagnose significant coronary artery disease compared to invasive coronary angiography in patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement or TAVI?
CCTA demonstrates high sensitivity and negative predictive value for detecting significant CAD in preoperative valve surgery patients, supporting its use as a non-invasive gatekeeper to avoid unnecessary invasive coronary angiography.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for assessing significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) aortic valve replacement (TAVR), with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference standard. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 28 studies to compare CCTA with ICA for preoperative coronary evaluation. Studies were stratified into two subgroups: the first consisting of those which included only patients undergoing valve surgery (n=19) and the second including TAVI or mixed (TAVI and surgical) populations (n=9). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy were recorded or determined, and a summary diagnostic performance was obtained by a random effects model. Pooled forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were also analysed. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of CCTA to diagnose significant CAD varied between 18 studies, ranging from 85% to 94%; the pooled sensitivity over all 28 studies was 91% (95% CI 88% to 93%) and the specificity was 88% (95% CI 84% to 91%). The pooled PPV was 78% (95% CI 72% to 83%), while the NPV was 95% (95% CI 93% to 97%). The diagnostic performance of the study was 89.8%. CONCLUSIONS: CCTA is a trustworthy, non-invasive diagnostic option to rule out significant CAD in patients undergoing valve surgery. Its high specificity in surgical candidates favours its use as a 'gatekeeper' to ICA with a potential reduction in unnecessary invasive surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alwaheidi et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement or TAVI/TAVR. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) vs. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for significant CAD (Sensitivity 91%, 95% CI 88% to 93%). Coronary CT angiography demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for significant CAD in valve surgery patients, with a pooled sensitivity of 91% (95% CI 88-93%) and specificity of 88% (95% CI 84-91%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: