Demonstrates effective AI integration in cancer center, indicating essential governance readiness.
The EU AI Act subjects high-risk clinical AI systems to deployer obligations whose institutional operationalization remains undefined. Drawing on experience at a French comprehensive cancer center, we present a governance framework combining three novel components: a dual-axis model for institutional risk stratification, a five-category AI-related adverse event taxonomy inspired by pharmacovigilance, and structured proficiency testing against simulated AI errors. Successful AI integration depends on institutional readiness, not algorithmic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gehin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: