Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines the efficacy of an attention-based MobileNetV2 for plant disease detection, suggesting improved accuracy on resource-constrained devices.
Leaf disease diagnosis needs models that are accurate enough for agronomic use yet small enough for constrained computing settings. This study examines a late-attention MobileNetV2 design in which one Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) is inserted between the last MobileNetV2 convolutional map and global average pooling. The experiments use 54,306 controlled-background PlantVillage images spanning 38 classes. Under a uniform saved-model re-evaluation, MobileNetV2 + CBAM obtained 97.17% accuracy and 97.15% weighted F1-score, whereas MobileNetV2 obtained 96.78% and 96.73%. On the converted models, paired testing gave a 0.64-percentage-point accuracy advantage for the CBAM variant (95% CI: 0.31–0.96; exact McNemar p<0.001). The proposed network has 4.02 million parameters, costs 0.604 GFLOPs (about 0.302 GMACs), and yields a 4.07 MiB dynamic-range-quantized TensorFlow Lite file with 96.70% accuracy. Batch-one inference on an Intel i7-11800H CPU with TensorFlow Lite/XNNPACK and eight threads reached a median of 45.42 ms (P95: 102.54 ms), excluding preprocessing. Grad-CAM inspection illustrates both lesion-centered activation and unresolved shared errors. The evidence therefore supports a compact accuracy–cost compromise for the tested conditions, while field robustness, energy use, repeated training runs, and target-device behavior remain open validation requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Udoh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: