Key result
Targeted next-generation sequencing is increasingly available and decreasing in cost, enabling its potential benefits for diagnosing monogenic dyslipidemias to be evaluated on a larger scale.
Why the study?
Does next-generation sequencing improve the diagnosis and management of monogenic dyslipidemias compared to traditional biochemical methods?
Does next-generation sequencing improve the diagnosis and management of monogenic dyslipidemias compared to traditional biochemical methods?
Next-generation sequencing is becoming a feasible and increasingly adopted tool for the clinical diagnosis of monogenic dyslipidemias, replacing traditional biochemical methods in some cases.
Targeted NGS may aid monogenic dyslipidemia diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the potential clinical translation of high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods in diagnosis and management of dyslipidemia. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent NGS experiments indicate that most causative genes for monogenic dyslipidemias are already known. Thus, monogenic dyslipidemias can now be diagnosed using targeted NGS. Targeting of dyslipidemia genes can be achieved by either: designing custom reagents for a dyslipidemia-specific NGS panel; or performing genome-wide NGS and focusing on genes of interest. Advantages of the former approach are lower cost and limited potential to detect incidental pathogenic variants unrelated to dyslipidemia. However, the latter approach is more flexible because masking criteria can be altered as knowledge advances, with no need for re-design of reagents or follow-up sequencing runs. Also, the cost of genome-wide analysis is decreasing and ethical concerns can likely be mitigated. DNA-based diagnosis is already part of the clinical diagnostic algorithms for familial hypercholesterolemia. Furthermore, DNA-based diagnosis is supplanting traditional biochemical methods to diagnose chylomicronemia caused by deficiency of lipoprotein lipase or its co-factors. SUMMARY: The increasing availability and decreasing cost of clinical NGS for dyslipidemia means that its potential benefits can now be evaluated on a larger scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hegele et al. (2015) conducted a review in Monogenic dyslipidemias. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was evaluated. Targeted next-generation sequencing is increasingly available and decreasing in cost, enabling its potential benefits for diagnosing monogenic dyslipidemias to be evaluated on a larger scale.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: