Key result
Accidental intravitreal injection of a veterinary inactivated FMD vaccine caused severe noninfectious intraocular inflammation requiring multiple vitrectomies and silicone oil tamponades.
Why the study?
Accidental intravitreal injection of non-human biological agents poses unique challenges, and no clinical reports exist regarding intraocular exposure to the swine foot-and-mouth disease vaccine.
Case Report (n=1)
Accidental intravitreal injection of veterinary FMD vaccine can cause severe noninfectious intraocular inflammation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alerts clinicians to rare ocular risks from veterinary vaccines; leaves open systematic study of incidence and prevention.
Penetrating ocular trauma is the main cause of irreversible loss of unilateral vision in young men. Among its rare presentations, accidental intravitreal injection of non-human biological agents poses unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The bivalent inactivated vaccine against swine foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) serotype O and A is currently an effective means of preventing swine FMD virus infection and is strictly prohibited for human use. To date, no clinical reports have been observed regarding intraocular exposure (particularly injection into the vitreous cavity) of this vaccine. This article presents a case of severe noninfectious intraocular inflammation resulting from accidental injection of the bivalent inactivated vaccine against swine FMD serotype O and A into the vitreous cavity, aiming to analyze its unique pathogenesis and summarize diagnostic and therapeutic lessons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Noninfectious intraocular inflammation (n=1). Accidental intravitreal injection of porcine bivalent inactivated FMD vaccine was evaluated on Visual acuity and resolution of intraocular inflammation. Accidental intravitreal injection of a veterinary inactivated FMD vaccine caused severe noninfectious intraocular inflammation requiring multiple vitrectomies and silicone oil tamponades.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: