Key result
Among asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, coronary artery calcium scoring was the most accurate screening modality for detecting coronary artery disease compared to carotid ultrasound and exercise treadmill testing, with an area under the curve of 0.94.
Why the study?
Does screening with CAC, ETT, or carotid ultrasound accurately detect pre-clinical atherosclerosis compared to CTA in asymptomatic individuals with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=98)
Blinded to other test results
No
Does screening with CAC, ETT, or carotid ultrasound accurately detect pre-clinical atherosclerosis compared to CTA in asymptomatic individuals with type 2 diabetes?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.94
p-value: p=<0.01
In asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, CAC scoring is the most accurate screening modality for detecting CAD, though carotid ultrasound may identify additional atherosclerotic risk in those with normal coronaries.
Hypothesis-generating for CAC screening in asymptomatic T2DM; does not support practice change without outcome trials.
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence to suggest that not all individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have equal risk for developing cardiovascular disease. We sought to compare the yield of testing for pre-clinical atherosclerosis with various approaches. METHODS: 98 asymptomatic individuals with T2DM without known coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled in a prospective study and underwent carotid ultrasound, exercise treadmill testing (ETT), coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring, and coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). RESULTS: Of 98 subjects (average age 55 ± 6, 64 % female), 43 (44 %) had coronary plaque detectable on CTA, and 38 (39 %) had CAC score >0. By CTA, 16 (16 %) had coronary stenosis ≥50 %, including three subjects with CAC = 0. Subjects with coronary plaque had greater prevalence of carotid plaque (58 % vs. 38 %, p = 0.01) and greater carotid intima media thickness (0.80 ± 0.20 mm vs. 0.70 ± 0.11 mm, p = 0.02). Notably, 18 of 55 subjects (33 %) with normal CTA had carotid plaque. Eight subjects had a positive ETT, of whom five had ≥ 50 % coronary stenosis, two had <50 % stenosis, and one had no CAD. Among these tests, CAC scoring had the highest sensitivity and specificity for prediction of CAD. CONCLUSION: Among asymptomatic subjects with T2DM, a majority (56 %) had no CAD by CTA. When compared to CTA, CAC was the most accurate screening modality for detection of CAD, while ETT and carotid ultrasound were less sensitive and specific. However, 33 % of subjects with normal coronary CTA had carotid plaque, suggesting that screening for carotid plaque might better characterize stroke risk in such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rassi et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=98). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring vs. Carotid ultrasound and exercise treadmill testing (ETT) was evaluated on Detection of coronary artery disease (any plaque) using coronary CTA as the reference standard (AUC 0.94, p=<0.01). Among asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes, coronary artery calcium scoring was the most accurate screening modality for detecting coronary artery disease compared to carotid ultrasound and exercise treadmill testing, with an area under the curve of 0.94.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: