Wildfire ash is transported in large quantities to receiving water bodies, where it may exert strong chemical controls on ecosystem function. To assess the role of fire ash in altering CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes in aquatic sediments, we designed three mesocosm experiments that compared the changing fluxes of these gases and water quality parameters under different loads and types of ash. Black ash (char) caused substantial drops in pH and increased CO 2 and CH 4 emissions through abiotic and biotic mechanisms, while white ash dramatically increased pH and enhanced CH 4 emissions, possibly due to inhibition of methanotrophy. White ash-driven increases in pH also instigated CO 2 uptake. If this abiotically driven CO 2 uptake could interact with ash-driven nutrient fertilization to synergistically enhance biotic CO 2 uptake in surface waters after a fire, these initial increases in pH may represent an important priming effect. Our findings suggest that strong ash flows following fires may trigger substantial pulses of heterotrophic or abiotically driven greenhouse gas emissions or uptake in recipient lentic aquatic ecosystems, which─although they may be overshadowed by autotrophic responses─may nonetheless be central to altered lake or wetland carbon balance following a fire.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Earl et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: