Key result
Higher RCRI score is linked to ~3-fold higher odds of intensive preoperative cardiac testing.
Why the study?
Preoperative cardiac testing overuse increases costs and delays surgeries, but patient, provider, and system-level factors driving testing variation have not been systematically studied.
What patient, provider, and system-level factors are associated with variation in preoperative cardiac testing in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery?
Systematic Review
What patient, provider, and system-level factors are associated with variation in preoperative cardiac testing in adults undergoing noncardiac surgery?
Addressing provider and system-level drivers, such as preoperative clinic referrals and regional practice cultures, offers potential modifiable targets to reduce low-value preoperative cardiac testing.
Patient and regional factors drive preoperative testing variation; supports targeting primary care and cardiologist density to reduce low-value care.
BACKGROUND: Overuse of preoperative cardiac testing contributes to high healthcare costs and delayed surgeries. A large body of research has evaluated factors associated with variation in preoperative cardiac testing. However, patient, provider, and system-level factors associated with variation in testing have not been systematically studied. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to better delineate the patient, provider, and system-level factors associated with variation in preoperative cardiac testing. METHODS: We included studies of an adult US population evaluating a patient, provider, or system-level factor associated with variation in preoperative cardiac testing for noncardiac surgery since 2012. Our search strategy used terms related to preoperative testing, diagnostic cardiac tests, and care variation with Ovid MEDLINE and Embase from inception through January 2023. We extracted study characteristics and factors associated with variation and qualitatively analyzed them. We assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Evidence Project Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles met inclusion criteria. Older age and higher comorbidity were strongly associated with higher-intensity testing. The evidence for provider and system-level covariates was weaker. However, there was strong evidence that a focus on primary care and away from preoperative clinic and cardiac consultations was associated with less testing and that interventions to reduce low-value testing can be successful. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant interprovider and interhospital variation in preoperative cardiac testing, the correlates of which are not well-defined. Further work should aim to better understand these factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellenbogen et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Noncardiac surgery. Patient, provider, and system-level factors (e.g., comorbidity, regional cardiologist density) vs. Reference groups for each factor (e.g., lower comorbidity, primary care clinic visit) was evaluated on Variation in intensity of preoperative cardiac testing. Older age and higher comorbidity (RCRI score 1 vs 0 OR 2.69-4.35) were strongly associated with higher-intensity preoperative cardiac testing, alongside higher regional cardiologist density.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: