Key result
Quantitative ECG analysis using two ST amplitudes from lead X yielded 85% sensitivity and 90% specificity for detecting CAD, compared to 50% and 95% for visual interpretation.
Why the study?
Does quantitative on-line computer processing of the Frank lead exercise ECG improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease compared to visual interpretation?
Cross-Sectional (n=224)
Does quantitative on-line computer processing of the Frank lead exercise ECG improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease compared to visual interpretation?
Quantitative computer processing of exercise ECGs significantly improves sensitivity for detecting coronary artery disease compared to standard visual interpretation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve CAD detection sensitivity with quantitative ECG; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
In order to improve the value of exercise tests for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) a system for on-line computer processing of the Frank lead exercise ECG was developed. Data were analyzed from 95 patients with CAD and 129 ostensibly healthy men. All subjects had a normal ECG at rest. Visual ECG interpretation during exercise yielded a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 95%. A large number of QRS and ST measurements were compared by discriminant function analysis in a group of 86 normal subjects and 52 patients (designated training group). Best results were obtained with a combination of two ST amplitudes from lead X: sensitivity, 85%, specificity, 90%. This was confirmed in a test group of 43 patients and 43 normal subjects. The results of the discriminant function were expressed as the likelihood ratio for an abnormal or normal ST segment at a given heart rate, a figure which provides a quantitative assessment of the degree of exercise-induces ischemia. This is a more realistic approach than classification into normal or abnormal since persons with and without CAD fall along the same continuous spectrum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simoons et al. (1977) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary artery disease (n=224). Quantitative ECG analysis vs. Visual ECG interpretation was evaluated on Detection of coronary artery disease. Quantitative ECG analysis using two ST amplitudes from lead X yielded 85% sensitivity and 90% specificity for detecting CAD, compared to 50% and 95% for visual interpretation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: