Why the study?
How should perioperative anticoagulation be managed in patients with atrial fibrillation?
How should perioperative anticoagulation be managed in patients with atrial fibrillation?
This review provides an algorithmic approach to perioperative anticoagulant management in patients with atrial fibrillation based on recent clinical trials.
May inform perioperative AF protocols to reduce bleeding; leaves open need for broader validation before routine adoption.
Defining the safest perioperative anticoagulation management approach for patients who are receiving chronic anticoagulant therapy stroke prevention has been a challenging and longstanding dilemma, especially for patients with atrial fibrillation who constitute the most common patient group receiving long term anticoagulation. Using a case-based format, we summarize the findings of recent clinical trialswhich have helped to informed best practices for perioperative anticoagulant management in patients with atrial fibrillation and provide an algorithmic management approach to this problem. We have done so by exploring the evidence to address 3 key questions: Is it necessary to interrupt anticoagulation for a procedure? How to estimate a patient's risk for perioperative thromboembolism and bleeding? If chronic anticoagulation interruption is required, is bridging anticoagulation with heparin needed?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tafur et al. (2015) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Perioperative bridging anticoagulation vs. No bridging or uninterrupted anticoagulation was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: