This review provides the first integrated analytical framework for evaluating waste lubricating oil (WLO) regeneration technologies; acid-clay treatment, solvent extraction, vacuum distillation, adsorption polishing, and hydro-treating, through the combined lenses of process design readiness, economic feasibility (CAPEX/OPEX), product quality (API Group classification), and decentralisation potential for developing economies. Unlike previous descriptive catalogues, this study introduces standardised techno-economic comparison across all technology categories and proposes a validated modular hybrid system (vacuum distillation coupled with adsorption polishing) specifically engineered for resource-constrained infrastructure realities, with Zimbabwe as a representative case study. Three principal findings emerge: (i) hybrid vacuum-adsorption systems (75-85% yield, moderate-high quality) achieve optimal compromise for decentralised contexts, (ii) adsorption polishing can functionally substitute for hydro-treating at 3-5% of capital cost, reframing selection criteria toward context-appropriate solutions; (iii) Zimbabwean domestic regeneration of around 10000 tonnes/year could displace 3-10% of lubricant imports (saving USD 2 - 3 million annually) while diverting 30,000 tonnes/year from improper disposal. The proposed modular system offers a validated pathway translating laboratory feasibility into economically sustainable industrial reality in developing economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kusangaya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: