Key result
Arrhythmia intervention linked to ~91% return to competitive sport in young elite athletes.
Why the study?
Does arrhythmia intervention allow return to competitive sport in elite young athletes with cardiac arrhythmias?
Observational (n=11)
No
Does arrhythmia intervention allow return to competitive sport in elite young athletes with cardiac arrhythmias?
Interventional treatment for significant arrhythmias in young elite athletes is highly effective and allows the majority to safely return to competitive sport without the need for long-term medication.
May support return to competitive sport without long-term medication after arrhythmia intervention in elite young athletes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death is the most common cause of mortality in young athletes. In some of these, the final pathway is arrhythmia. The authors aimed to identify the incidence, diagnosis and management of athletes undergoing investigation and intervention for cardiac arrhythmias. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients between 10 and 17 years presenting to a supra-regional paediatric cardiac unit for investigation and intervention for a cardiac arrhythmia. Elite athletes (county and national level) were identified from the departmental clinical and arrhythmia databases (October 1997-2007). Patients with significant congenital heart disease were excluded. RESULTS: From 657 patients undergoing 680 interventions, 324 were excluded. From the remaining 333 we identified 11 elite athletes - football (n=3), martial arts (n=2), rugby (n=2), triple jump, netball, canoeing, and motor sport (n=1). Presenting symptoms included palpitations (n=8) and syncope (n=1). Two were asymptomatic and investigated following routine screening. Diagnoses included atrioventricular (AV) re-entry tachycardia (n=3), AV node re-entry tachycardia (n=4), complete heart block (n=1), sinus node dysfunction (n=1), vasovagal syncope (n=1) and pre-excited atrial fibrillation (n=1). Arrhythmia interventions included implantable loop recorder (n=2), diagnostic electrophysiology study (n=9), including radiofrequency ablation (n=5), cryoablation (n=2) and pacemaker implantation (n=2). Following intervention, 10 children returned to competitive sport. There were no deaths. No child required long-term medication post-intervention. CONCLUSION: Of the young competitive athletes identified from the authors' study, there was a high incidence of significant arrhythmias. Intervention is usually successful and most athletes return to elite sport without the need for long-term medication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Cardiac arrhythmias (n=11). Arrhythmia interventions (electrophysiology study, ablation, pacemaker, or implantable loop recorder) was evaluated on Return to competitive sport. Arrhythmia intervention was highly successful in young elite athletes, with 91% (10 of 11) returning to competitive sport without the need for long-term medication.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: