Why the study?
As structural heart disease interventions evolve, demand for minimally invasive intraprocedural imaging techniques has increased, highlighting the emergence of intracardiac echocardiography as a modality offering real-time visualization without general anesthesia.
Does intracardiac echocardiography provide effective intraprocedural imaging guidance compared to transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing structural heart disease interventions?
Does intracardiac echocardiography provide effective intraprocedural imaging guidance compared to transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing structural heart disease interventions?
This SCAI position statement establishes standardized imaging protocols and clinical pathways to integrate intracardiac echocardiography into structural heart disease interventions, improving procedural efficiency by avoiding general anesthesia.
Standardizes ICE protocols for structural interventions without general anesthesia; extends consensus to guide consistent adoption and future trials.
As structural heart disease interventions rapidly evolve, demand for minimally invasive intraprocedural imaging techniques has increased. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has emerged as a valuable imaging modality, offering real-time, high-resolution visualization of cardiac structures without the need for general anesthesia. This position statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions outlines the clinical applications, advantages, limitations, and implementation strategies for ICE in guiding transcatheter structural heart disease procedures. The document details standardized ICE imaging protocols and views for interventions involving the mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary valves, as well as left atrial appendage occlusion atrial septal defect, and patent foramen ovale closure. It emphasizes the importance of operator training, physician workflows, and institutional readiness for successful ICE integration. The statement also advocates for updated reimbursement models that reflect the complexity and value of ICE-guided procedures and calls for further research comparing ICE and transesophageal echocardiography outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eleid et al. (2025) conducted a review in Structural Heart Disease. Intracardiac echocardiography vs. Transesophageal echocardiography was evaluated. The SCAI position statement provides standardized protocols and implementation strategies for intracardiac echocardiography to guide transcatheter structural heart disease interventions without general anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: