This was a head-to-head comparison between 68 Ga-labeled prostatespecific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 and 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT in a series of 10 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence. Methods: In total, 288 patients with PCa recurrence were enrolled in a prospective study of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging for recurrent disease localization (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02940262). We retrospectively identified 10 patients who underwent clinically indicated 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT prior to enrollment. Results: The median time between the 2 scans was 2.2 mo (range, 0.2-4.2 mo). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was 1.0 ng/mL (mean, 4.7 ng/mL; range, 0.13-18.1 ng/mL) and 1.1 ng/mL (mean, 6.2 ng/mL; range, 0.24-31.3 ng/mL) at the time of 18 F-fluciclovine and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, respectively. Five of 10 patients (50%) were negative with 18 F-fluciclovine but positive with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Two of 10 patients (20%) were positive with both 18 F-fluciclovine and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, but 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT showed additional lymph nodes metastasis. Three of 10 patients (30%) were negative with both 18 F-fluciclovine and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Conclusion: This case series suggests improved detection rates for 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT when compared with 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT in patients with recurrent PCa. Prospective trials designed to directly compare the two should be initiated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calais et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: