Key result
Human ACE2 is highly sensitive to DX600 inhibition (IC50 ~0.09 μM), whereas rodent ACE2 is much less sensitive (IC50 ~7 μM), necessitating optimized assay conditions with 10 μM DX600 at pH 6.5 to accurately quantify endogenous rodent ACE2.
Population
Recombinant human, mouse, and rat ACE2 overexpressed in cell lines and endogenous ACE2 from tissues of 3…
Comparison
DX600 at varying concentrations and pH conditions vs Absence of DX600
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Urges caution extrapolating recombinant ACE2 assays to endogenous activity in mice; leaves open validated protocols for cardiovascular research.
Rodent ACE2 is significantly less sensitive to the inhibitor DX600 than human ACE2, requiring optimized assay conditions (pH 6.5, 10 μM DX600) for accurate quantification of endogenous murine ACE2 activity.
Pedersen et al. (2011) studied this question. DX600 vs. 1 μM DX600 or uninhibited ACE2 was evaluated on Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of DX600 for ACE2. Human ACE2 is highly sensitive to DX600 inhibition (IC50 ~0.09 μM), whereas rodent ACE2 is much less sensitive (IC50 ~7 μM), necessitating optimized assay conditions with 10 μM DX600 at pH 6.5 to accurately quantify endogenous rodent ACE2.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: