Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To obtain clues to how to improve the effectiveness of cathode nanocatalysts in fuel cells, the interfacial structure of Nafion–Pt/C and Nafion–Pt 3 Co/C in fully humidified N 2 at room temperature was, for the first time, investigated by in situ attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy by use of a membrane-electrode assembly (MEA) type cell without any supporting electrolyte solution. We identified four types of adsorbed species at the interface with changing the electrode potential, that is, sulfonate anions (SO 3 – ) with ether groups (C–O–C) in the Nafion side chain, water molecules (adsorbed H 2 O ad and/or hydrating SO 3 – groups), and hydrated protons [H + (H 2 O) n ]. For a Pt skin layer formed on Pt 3 Co/C, it was clearly observed that the band intensities assigned to the water bending mode δ(HOH) of both H + (H 2 O) n (1800 and 1720 cm –1 ) and H 2 O ad (1610 cm –1 ) decreased with increasing potential more positive than 0.2 V vs RHE, accompanied by increases in those of ν s (SO 3 – ) (1050 cm –1 ) and ν(C–O–C) (965 cm –1 ). This indicates that the SO 3 – groups with an ether side chain in Nafion adsorbed specifically on the catalyst surface, while expelling H + (H 2 O) n and H 2 O ad originally adsorbed at less positive potentials. We also found that the onset potential for the specific adsorption of the SO 3 – group in the Nafion side chain on the Pt skin layer formed on Pt 3 Co was less positive by ca . 0.2 V than that on Pt, which is a tendency similar to that found for the specific adsorption of ClO 4 – anions on these electrodes in our recent results obtained by use of the electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanawa et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: