Key result
Athletes with type IV cardiac rhythm regulation had a more significant contribution of the low-frequency component in spontaneous respiration regulation than athletes with types I and II.
Cross-Sectional (n=202)
Different types of autonomic cardiac rhythm regulation in highly trained athletes are associated with distinct patterns of spontaneous respiration, such as altered expiratory duration in those with fatigue-related regulation.
Type IV regulation links to greater low-frequency respiratory input in athletes; hypothesis-generating for autonomic subtypes, needs prospective validation before monitoring changes.
Using spiroarteriocardiorhythmography, 202 highly qualified male athletes aged 22.6 ± 2.8 years, who are representatives of acyclic sports were examined. According to HRV (hearth rate variability), the types of the athletes' cardiac rhythm regulation were determined. There are 4 types of autonomic regulation of cardiac rhythm: Type I – indicates moderate stress, Type II – indicates a decrease in the functional state of regulatory systems, the development of fatigue, Type III – indicates the optimal state of regulation, Type IV – indicates overstrain of autonomic regulation or high fitness. The athletes with a predominance of central (types I and II) and autonomous (types III and IV) effects on the cardiac rhythm regulation are differentiated by indicators of total respiration power (TPR, (l/min)²) and power in the high frequency range (HFR), (l/min)²). Athletes with the type IV cardiac rhythm regulation had a more significant contribution of the low-frequency component (LFRn, n.u.) in the regulation of spontaneous respiration than athletes with type I and II cardiac rhythm regulation. In the type II regulation of cardiac rhythm there is a significant decrease in expiratory duration (s), which is also manifested by a significant increase in the ratio of inspiratory and expiratory phases, which may characterize expiratory insufficiency for this type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Романчук et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Highly trained athletes (n=202). Cardiac rhythm regulation types based on HRV vs. Different types of cardiac rhythm regulation was evaluated on Spontaneous respiration parameters (total respiration power, high/low frequency range power, expiratory duration). Athletes with type IV cardiac rhythm regulation had a more significant contribution of the low-frequency component in spontaneous respiration regulation than athletes with types I and II.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: