Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
// Mark A. Brown 1, * , Kenneth Foreman 2, * , June Harriss 3 , Chhaya Das 3 , Li Zhu 3 , Melissa Edwards 1, 3 , Salam Shaaban 4 , Haley Tucker 3 1 Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 2 Coferon Inc., Stony Brook, NY 11791, USA 3 University of Texas at Austin, Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Austin, TX 78712, USA 4 Abbvie, Worcester, MA 01605, USA * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Haley Tucker, e-mail: haleytucker@austin.utexas.edu Keywords: HSP90, SMYD3, tumorigenesis, lysine methylation, histone modifications Received: August 08, 2014 Accepted: December 16, 2014 Published: March 02, 2015 ABSTRACT The SMYD3 histone methyl transferase (HMTase) and the nuclear chaperone, HSP90, have been independently implicated as proto-oncogenes in several human malignancies. We show that a degenerate tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-like domain encoded in the SMYD3 C-terminal domain (CTD) mediates physical interaction with HSP90. We further demonstrate that the CTD of SMYD3 is essential for its basal HMTase activity and that the TPR-like structure is required for HSP90-enhanced enzyme activity. Loss of SMYD3-HSP90 interaction leads to SMYD3 mislocalization within the nucleus, thereby losing its chromatin association. This results in reduction of SMYD3-mediated cell proliferation and, potentially, impairment of SMYD3’s oncogenic activity. These results suggest a novel approach for blocking HSP90-driven malignancy in SMYD3-overexpressing cells with a reduced toxicity profile over current HSP90 inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: