Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Whereas the norms of the academic world and medical ethics prohibited academics and doctors from applying for patents on medical inventions, the University of Toronto decided in 1922 to file a patent application on the discovery of insulin, covering both the therapeutic substance and the isolation and purification processes developed by the inventors. The University extended its patent to 25 countries in North America, Europe, Latin America, Australia, India and Japan. An Insulin Committee was set up to ‘administer the patents in the public interest’. Toronto University's intention was to use its industrial property rights in a particular way: to control the standards and quality of a potentially dangerous drug, and to prevent the emergence of a monopoly that might limit the drug's accessibility to patients. The administration of insulin patents ‘in the public interest’ was a highly controversial subject during the inter‐war years. On the one hand there were those who advocated regulation of the quality of drugs via patents and, on the other hand, those who opposed the idea of the University of Toronto receiving royalties to finance its medical research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cassier et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: