Longitudinal analysis investigates game exposure's effects on training loads and performance in Division I football, suggesting tailored training strategies.
Game participation in American football is highly variable, complicating interpretation of external training loads during competition. This study aimed to provide a longitudinal, exposure-aware characterization of external training loads in Division I NCAA American football and to examine exploratory associations between load and on-field performance. External training load data were collected from 232 players across 10 competitive seasons (4,084 player-game observations) using wearable tracking devices. Total and exposure-normalized (per-snap) external training load metrics were examined by positional group and game exposure using linear mixed-effects models. Total external training load increased with greater game exposure across all metrics. In contrast, exposure-normalized external training load decreased with increasing exposure, with per-snap PlayerLoad higher in Low compared with Moderate (Δ = 8.73 AU·snap−1, d = 0.83, p < 0.001) and High exposure (Δ = 11.60 AU·snap−1, d = 1.10, p < 0.001). Exposure-related reductions in per-snap load were consistent across positional groups despite positional differences in absolute load. For offense, higher total external training load was positively associated with performance (β = 0.015, p < 0.001). In contrast, greater exposure-normalized running and sprinting distance were associated with lower defensive performance (all p < 0.01). These findings highlight a robust exposure – load trade-off and the importance of accounting for game exposure when interpreting competition demands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lever et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: