Key result
DAPT ties to lower early neurological deterioration risk only in large-artery stroke, differing by etiology.
Why the study?
Little is known about neurological worsening during the first 24 hours after stroke admission, and the relationship between DAPT and very early neurological deterioration across different stroke etiologies remains unclear.
Does newly initiated dual antiplatelet therapy reduce very early neurological deterioration in adults with non-cardioembolic acute ischemic stroke compared to single antiplatelet therapy?
Population
1,207 consecutive adults with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke admitted to a Swiss tertiary stroke center
Comparison
Newly initiated DAPT vs SAPT across stroke etiologies (LAA vs non-LAA)
Design
Retrospective single-center cohort study
Follow-up
24 hours
Authors
Loading...
DAPT was associated with etiology-specific vEND risk differences; leaves open whether subtype-tailored strategies warrant prospective trials.
Cohort (n=1,207)
No
Does newly initiated dual antiplatelet therapy reduce very early neurological deterioration in adults with non-cardioembolic acute ischemic stroke compared to single antiplatelet therapy?
Effect estimate: Adjusted risk difference -7.3% (LAA) and 16.6% (non-LAA)
p-value: p=<0.001
DAPT may be associated with a lower risk of very early neurological deterioration in LAA stroke but not in non-LAA stroke, highlighting the need for etiology-specific antiplatelet strategies.
Pereppadan et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke (n=1,207). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) was evaluated on Very early neurological deterioration (vEND) defined as NIHSS increase ≥4 points within 24 hours (Adjusted risk difference -7.3% (LAA) and 16.6% (non-LAA), p=<0.001). In patients with non-cardioembolic stroke, the association between DAPT and very early neurological deterioration differed by etiology, with a numerically lower risk in LAA stroke and a higher risk in non-LAA stroke (p_interaction < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: