Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates targeted levofloxacin delivery to the prostate, reducing systemic exposure and enhancing local concentrations.
Objective: Current pharmacological treatments for prostate diseases are limited by poor drug penetration into the prostate and systemic adverse effects. This study evaluated whether a novel vas-deferens injection device could improve targeted delivery of levofloxacin to the prostate. Methods: Healthy adult male Sprague–Dawley rats received a single dose of levofloxacin by either intravenous administration (IV) or trans-vas-deferens administration using a novel disposable device (VS). Plasma and prostate samples were collected from 0.5 to 24 h and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Iodixanol micro-CT imaging was used to visualize the local delivery pathway. Pharmacokinetic evaluation included observed composite-profile Cmax/Tmax, AUC0-24, and fT. Time-dependent tissue selectivity was evaluated through partial AUC analyses, prostate-to-plasma exposure ratios, and pointwise concentration ratios. A bioequivalence-style framework was applied to compare relative exposure parameters using geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with the 80.00–125.00% reference interval. Exploratory PK/PD evaluation combined literature-derived free-drug fractions (fut_plasma = 0.55, fut_prostate = 0.080) to estimate fAUC/MIC against representative uropathogens, supplemented by Monte Carlo simulation (n = 5000) to estimate probability of target attainment (PTA) at an fAUC/MIC ≥ 30 threshold. Results: Imaging confirmed selective distribution within the reproductive tract after vas-deferens delivery. In plasma, VS substantially reduced systemic exposure compared with IV: Cmax was 4.74 μg/mL (VS) versus 10.72 μg/mL (IV), and AUC0-24 was 15.47 versus 28.59 μg·h/mL. In the prostate, VS maintained comparable or numerically higher exposure: Cmax was 61.96 μg/g (VS) versus 52.02 μg/g (IV), and AUC0-24 was 235.77 versus 208.77 μg·h/g. The tissue distribution factor fT was substantially elevated in VS (2.26; 95% CI: 1.58–3.19) compared with IV (1.06; 95% CI: 0.89–1.30). Bioequivalence-style analysis demonstrated that plasma GMRs for AUC0-24 and Cmax fell well below 80%, confirming reduced systemic burden, while prostate GMRs were maintained, and the prostate-to-plasma AUC ratio GMR was increased. Time-dependent partial AUC analyses revealed that VS significantly elevated the prostate-to-plasma exposure ratio. PK/PD evaluation showed that at 24 h, prostate fAUC/MIC against Enterobacteriaceae (MIC = 0.5 μg/mL) was 37.7 (VS) versus 33.4 (IV), with corresponding PTA values of 97% and 94%, while plasma fAUC/MIC remained substantially lower in the VS group. Conclusions: Trans-vas-deferens administration of levofloxacin via a novel injection device effectively reduced systemic drug exposure while maintaining or enhancing prostate tissue concentrations, thereby widening the therapeutic window and reducing systemic drug exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: