Pilot interventional study evaluates ctDNA as a biomarker for response in advanced oesophageal adenocarcinoma, suggesting further research is needed.
Background: Second line treatments for advanced oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) have limited efficacy, and biomarkers for early relapse are needed. We evaluated the use of a Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) based circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) assay to predict the efficacy of PD-L1 second line monotherapy in patients with advanced OAC in a prospective, single-centre, pilot study. Methods: 19 participants received Durvalumab every four weeks. ctDNA was analysed with Guardant 360® CDx at baseline, weeks 4 and 7. Radiological response at week 26 was assessed by RECIST v1.1. Concordance between ctDNA and CT results was pre-defined as either ≥50% increase in ctDNA mean variant allele frequency (VAF) with progressive disease, or ≥50% decrease with radiological response or stable disease. The primary endpoint was to explore whether early changes in ctDNA levels can predict 6-month response to durvalumab by RECIST criteria and considered positive with ≥70% concordance, Tissue biomarkers were assessed with 30X Whole Genome Sequencing. Results: At week four, 6/17 patients (35.3%) have ctDNA VAF changes ≥50%, of which 4/17 (23.5%) show concordance. At week seven, 8/12 (66.7%) have ctDNA changes ≥50%, with concordance in 6/12 participants (50.0%). In post-hoc analyses, 9/12 (75%) of patients show concordance with any ctDNA change at week seven, and the participants with any increase in ctDNA all have progression (5/5 week four, and 7/7 week seven). Conclusions: Although the study’s primary endpoint was not reached, our data supports assessing ctDNA for immunotherapy response prediction. We report that even a modest increase in ctDNA could indicate progressive disease, assisting decision-making to cease ineffective treatments. Further research for the use of ctDNA in OAC is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pacey et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: