Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Framework reveals opportunities for decision-makers to pay for improved information, enhancing model accuracy.
This paper proposes a framework for assessing whether misspecified decision-makers would be willing to pay for information that can potentially make them less misspecified. We introduce a prior-free approach, based on “constrained” maximal regret, to derive an upper bound on the subjective assessment of potential gains from acquiring a more accurate model. The constraint stems from the information currently available to the decision-maker. We apply our approach to three prominent models of misspecified beliefs: coarse expectations, causal misperceptions, and sampling equilibria. (JEL D83, D84, D91)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eilat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: