Key result
Balloon-expandable TAVI achieves ~71% VARC-3 device success for aortic insufficiency in LVAD patients.
Why the study?
Aortic insufficiency during LVAD support causes maladaptive recirculatory flow and congestion, but surgical correction carries high risk and TAVI is challenged by complex anatomy and lack of calcific anchoring.
Does balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) improve outcomes in LVAD-supported patients with native aortic insufficiency?
Cohort (n=14)
No
Does balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) improve outcomes in LVAD-supported patients with native aortic insufficiency?
In LVAD-supported patients with complex anatomy, balloon-expandable TAVI is a feasible strategy that eliminates clinically significant native aortic insufficiency with zero procedural mortality, though early mortality remains high due to advanced heart failure.
High early mortality unrelated to device failure warrants caution with balloon-expandable TAVI in LVAD patients; this small cohort leaves open its net benefit.
Background: Aortic insufficiency (AI) during long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support creates a maladaptive recirculatory loop that impairs forward flow, increases left ventricular filling pressures, leading to progressive congestion, and accelerates right ventricular dysfunction. Surgical correction carries high risk, making transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) an alternative strategy, although outcomes are challenged by complex annular geometry and the absence of calcific anchoring. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of consecutive LVAD-supported patients undergoing TAVI for native AI. Annular sizing was area-based with a predefined oversizing strategy of approximately 15–30%, adjusted to annular geometry. Balloon-expandable valves were implanted using controlled deployment under rapid pacing and temporary LVAD flow reduction. Outcomes were assessed according to VARC-3 definitions. Results: Fourteen patients underwent TAVI. The cohort demonstrated high anatomical complexity, including annular eccentricity (median 0.21 [IQR 0.19–0.23]), horizontal aorta (42.9%), and flared left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) morphology (50%). Median annular area was 528 mm2 (IQR 487–574), with area-derived diameter 25.9 mm (IQR 24.9–27.0). Mean oversizing was 21.9% (median 20.0%; range 15.1–30.3%). Technical and VARC-3 device success were achieved in 71.4%. Second valve implantation occurred in 28.6%. Procedural mortality was 0%. In-hospital mortality (21.4%) was related to low cardiac output and multi-organ dysfunction rather than device failure. No survivor had moderate or greater residual AI at discharge. Conclusions: In anatomically complex LVAD patients, an anatomy-driven balloon-expandable TAVI strategy achieved elimination of clinically significant AI with zero procedural mortality. In our interpretation, mortality reflected the advanced stage of heart failure at the time of intervention rather than acute device-related failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karaduman et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in LVAD-associated native aortic insufficiency (n=14). Balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was evaluated on VARC-3 device success.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: