Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Deterministic rule calculates integer membership using Fibonacci and Zeckendorf principles, revealing patterns in density and distributions.
The Golden Exclusion Sieve is a deterministic subset of the positive integers defined by a self-referential density rule. To decide whether an integer (v) is admitted, the rule counts earlier admitted integers in the interval between ( v/φ) and (v), then compares that count with the interval’s golden-ratio capacity. Although the definition is nonlocal, the resulting system is governed by finite-state structure. The central theorem pins every shell count to one of two adjacent integers. This yields an (O(log n)) counting recursion and a primitive six-state substitution whose type projection is the Fibonacci substitution. The sieve has density (1/φ), sharp bounds on admitted and rejected runs, and exact gap and run distributions. Every Fibonacci number (F_k≥ 3) is excluded, every Fibonacci predecessor (F_k-1) is admitted, and every Lucas number from (29) onward is excluded. The discrepancy (D(n)=A(n)-n/φ) has an exact normal form. Its global maximum is (2/φ^2), its scale-wise maxima occur at Fibonacci predecessors, and its record minima are exactly ( F_m/2-1). Its lower envelope equals (-13log_φ n) plus a bounded asymptotically log-periodic correction of exact amplitude (1/2). Finally, every positive integer has a constrained Fibonacci-valued ancestry word. Reversed ancestry digits recover the full six-state substitution letter. Valid padded Zeckendorf representations are read by a minimal nine-state membership automaton, while simultaneous recognition of representation validity and sieve membership requires exactly eleven states. Thus a single self-referential crowding rule admits equivalent descriptions through arithmetic recursion, symbolic substitution, Fibonacci numeration, and finite automata.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jake Foth (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: