Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares freshwater production in solar stills with and without nano materials, suggesting enhancements in efficiency.
Solar stills are considered an effective solution to produce fresh drinking water from saline water. Solar stills utilize solar energy, which is available in abundant quantity for long periods across Middle Eastern countries like Oman. In this study, two single-slope passive solar stills are fabricated with two configurations: a Conventional Solar Still (CSS) and a Modified Solar Still (MSS). The CSS is the basic model, whereas the MSS is a model obtained by incorporating copper tubes that are filled with phase change material (PCM) combined with nano copper oxide particles, which are attached inside the basin. The objective of this study is to compare the performance of the two systems from energy, exergy, and economical aspects. The solar stills were fabricated according to the geometrical conditions of the city Nizwa, Oman, and the standards for the fabrication of each solar still component. The highlights of this research are comparing the performance of the CSS and MSS under the prevailing atmospheric conditions of the city Nizwa, Oman, and investigating the effects of the nano materials and phase change materials used in the MSS on its performance. The results of the study reveal certain important facts; for example, higher thermal conductivity of the copper tubes increases the heat transfer and evaporation of saline water inside the basin. The freshwater production in the MSS was higher than in the CSS, with an average difference of about 79.75%. This difference in freshwater production is due to the accumulated heat storage and release of heat from the PCM material combined with nanoparticles during reduced solar radiation. The nanoparticles contributed to an increase in the heat transfer rate of the PCM. The presence of copper tubes filled with nano-PCM in the MSS influences and increases both energy and exergy efficiencies to around 30 to 35% and 1 to 1.5% compared to those in the CSS. The increased efficiencies in the MSS are due to its improved evaporation and condensation rates, which enhance the energy utilization in the process of converting saline water to freshwater.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radhakrishnan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: