Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Article examines the impact of global dependencies on Brazil's agrifood system, indicating pathways for post-growth futures.
This article examines how global interdependencies shape Brazil’s agrifood systems and their capacity to pursue post-growth pathways. Post-growth (or degrowth) envisions economies reorganized around well-being, justice, and ecological limits rather than GDP growth. While increasingly discussed globally, its viability in the Global South and in critical sectors such as agrifood remains underexplored. Brazil’s agrifood sector offers a critical case, as it underpins export-led growth while driving most national greenhouse gas emissions and severe socio-environmental impacts. Drawing on World-Systems Analysis, decolonial theory, and post-growth thought, this study combines export data of soybeans, corn, sugar, and meat with a Document Analysis of international agreements and national policy documents from 1990 to 2020 to unravel interdependent dynamics and patterns over time. Findings reveal that binding trade agreements entrench growth-oriented narratives of efficiency and productivity, embedding Brazil’s agrifood governance within a (green) growth agenda. This has deepened environmental degradation and social conflicts. Post-growth principles, such as sufficiency, commons, and regeneration, appear mainly in non-binding agreements, but remain marginal in state policy. Yet multipolar geopolitical shifts and strong grassroots initiatives signal openings for post-growth agrifood futures, requiring institutional, technological, and financial reorientation towards sufficiency, justice, and care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cruz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: