Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory analysis demonstrates that handgrip strength correlates with psoas area in liver transplant candidates, suggesting implications for patient evaluation.
Background Previous studies suggest that handgrip strength may correlate with muscle mass in cirrhosis, but validation across diverse transplant cohorts remains limited. We sought to validate whether previously reported correlations between handgrip strength and computed tomography (CT)-derived psoas-area estimates hold in a single-center cohort of liver transplant candidates and to explore whether a bedside prediction model could be derived. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 96 patients with end-stage liver cirrhosis undergoing transplant evaluation at University Hospital Essen (January 2020–December 2024) underwent standardized handgrip strength, 4-meter gait time, and diameter-product-derived psoas area estimates. Pearson correlation, multiple linear regression, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. Results Handgrip strength significantly correlated with total psoas area ( $$r = 0.35$$ , 95% CI 0.16–0.51, pₐdj = 0.002 ). Multiple linear regression yielded a prediction model ( R² = 0.27 ) achieving 72% sensitivity and 68% specificity for sarcopenia detection (AUC = 0.74). In multivariate Cox regression, each 100 mm 2 /m 2 increase in psoas index reduced waiting list mortality by 15% (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.73–0.98, $$p = 0.032$$ ) and post-transplant mortality by 18% (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.71–0.95, $$p = 0.002$$ ). Conclusion Handgrip strength shows a modest, statistically significant association with diameter-product-derived psoas area estimates in liver transplant candidates. The derived prediction model has limited accuracy ( R² = 0.27 , AUC = 0.74) and cannot defer clinically indicated CT imaging; it may assist in identifying candidates who warrant confirmatory imaging or closer nutritional follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malamutmann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: