Investigates causal relationships between radiation doses and osteoradionecrosis in cancer patients, suggesting implications for treatment guidelines.
Distinguishing causal relationships from statistical correlations remains a fundamental challenge in clinical research, limiting the translation of observational findings into interventional treatment guidelines. Here we investigate whether causal machine learning can be used to explore estimated causal effects of radiation dose parameters on mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN), using a case study of 931 head and neck cancer patients treated with volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Using generalized random forests, all examined dosimetric factors showed positive estimated causal effects on ORN development (average treatment effects: 0.092–0.141). Integration with explainable machine learning suggested substantial treatment effect heterogeneity, with the largest estimated conditional average treatment effects observed in patients aged 50-60 years and smaller estimates in patients over 70 years. These results suggest that causal machine learning can help quantify dose-related effects and explore heterogeneity across patient characteristics. More broadly, this work provides a methodological framework for toxicity studies in oncology and other clinical settings where complex dose–response relationships warrant further prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: