Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Focused review synthesizes evidence on VR's role in understanding human responses in underground spaces, highlighting research gaps.
Underground spaces are becoming increasingly important in high-density urban environments, yet their restricted sensory conditions, limited natural references, and distinctive spatial characteristics make human responses difficult to evaluate. Virtual reality (VR) provides a controlled platform for investigating perception, cognition, and emotion in underground environments. This review synthesizes a focused body of evidence at the intersection of VR-based simulation, underground environments, and human-response assessment. A corpus of 28 studies was analysed using qualitative coding and evidence mapping. Environmental variables were organised into six categories, and reported outcomes were interpreted through a perception cognition emotion (PCE) framework. The reviewed studies show that visual conditions and biophilic interventions are frequently associated with perceptual, cognitive, and emotional outcomes, while wayfinding-related factors are most commonly represented in cognitive outcomes involving orientation, route choice, and decision-making under uncertainty or stress. The evidence also reveals a strong methodological emphasis on visually oriented and single-factor experimental designs, while multi-factor interactions and non-visual environmental influences remain comparatively underexplored. By providing a structured synthesis of current evidence, this review highlights methodological characteristics, identifies research gaps, and offers directions for future VR-based underground-environment research and human-centred design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: