Key result
Routine twice-weekly exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for eight weeks did not increase peak oxygen uptake compared to abstention from supervised exercise in patients with coronary heart disease.
Why the study?
Recent evidence suggests routine exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation may not substantially increase estimated VO2peak, potentially reducing its benefits and explaining why it no longer improves survival.
Does a routine, twice weekly, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programme improve peak oxygen uptake in patients with coronary heart disease?
Does a routine, twice weekly, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programme improve peak oxygen uptake in patients with coronary heart disease?
Routine twice-weekly exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation, as currently delivered, may provide an insufficient training stimulus to significantly improve peak oxygen uptake or other physiological markers in patients with coronary heart disease.
Current twice-weekly cardiac rehabilitation may not enhance peak oxygen uptake; leaves open whether intensified protocols improve fitness in coronary heart disease.
Background Recent evidence suggests that routine exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) may not lead to a substantial increase in estimated peak oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ). This could reduce the potential benefits of CR and explain why CR no longer improves patient survival in recent studies. We aimed to determine whether routine exercise-based CR increases V̇O 2peak using gold-standard maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and to quantify the exercise training stimulus which might be insufficient in patients undertaking CR. Methods We studied the effects of a routine, twice weekly, exercise-based CR programme for eight weeks (intervention group) compared with abstention from supervised exercise training (control group) in patients with coronary heart disease. The primary outcome was V̇O 2peak measured using CPET. We also measured changes in body composition using dual X-ray absorptiometry, carotid intima-media thickness, hs-CRP and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide at baseline, 10 weeks and 12 months. We also calculated the Calibre 5-year all-cause mortality risk score. Results Seventy patients (age 63.1 SD10.0 years; BMI 29.2 SD4.0 kg·m −2 ; 86% male) were recruited ( n = 48 intervention; n = 22 controls). The mean aerobic exercise training duration was 23 min per training session, and the mean exercise training intensity was 45.9% of heart rate reserve. V̇O 2peak was 23·3 ml·kg -1 ·min −1 at baseline, and there were no changes in V̇O 2peak between groups at any time point. The intervention had no effect on any of the secondary endpoints. Conclusion Routine CR does not lead to an increase in V̇O 2peak and is unlikely to improve long-term physiological outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nichols et al. (2020) studied Coronary heart disease (n=70). Routine exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation vs. Abstention from supervised exercise training was evaluated on V̇O 2peak measured using CPET. Routine twice-weekly exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for eight weeks did not increase peak oxygen uptake compared to abstention from supervised exercise in patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: