Key result
The AIGIS(RX) antibacterial envelope prevented device-related infections in a rabbit model, with no pathogens recovered compared to infection in 100% of control samples.
Why the study?
Does the AIGIS(RX) antibacterial envelope prevent device-related infections in a rabbit model of pacing device implantation?
Does the AIGIS(RX) antibacterial envelope prevent device-related infections in a rabbit model of pacing device implantation?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 100%
The AIGIS(RX) antibacterial envelope effectively prevents pacing device-related infections from multiple bacterial strains and eliminates biofilm formation in a rabbit model.
Reduces infection risk in this animal model; leaves open translation to human CIED recipients.
BACKGROUND: Device-related infections represent a significant clinical challenge. Once established, these infections prove difficult to treat with existing antibiotic regimens, compromising the health of device recipients, and usually requiring surgical intervention to resolve. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of the AIGIS(RX) antibacterial envelope (TyRx Pharma, Inc., Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) designed to reduce device-related infections by incorporating minocycline and rifampin in a controlled release polymer. METHODS: An infection was established in a rabbit model by creating bilateral subcutaneous implant pockets, into which a pacing device with or without AIGIS(RX) was placed. The incisions were closed, and a defined dose of bacteria was infused into each implant pocket. After 7 days, devices were explanted and sampled for viable bacteria by swabbing and sonication. RESULTS: Initial studies evaluated the ability of the AIGIS(RX) pouch to reduce Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epi) infection in this model using clinical and quantitative microbial endpoints. Results demonstrate S. epi infection in all control samples, while no pathogens were recovered from samples with the AIGIS(RX) pouch. Systemic antibiotic levels were undetectable. Additional studies tested the efficacy of the AIGIS(RX) pouch with additional bacterial strains, Staphylococcus capitis, Escherichia coli, and Acinetobacter Baumannii. In each case, the device and implant pocket with the AIGIS(RX) pouch was free of any signs of infection. An assessment of biofilm produced by Acinetobacter demonstrated the elimination of biofilm formation on the implanted device. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that in this animal model, the AIGIS(RX) device reduces the risk for infection of viable pathogens within implant pockets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hansen et al. (2009) studied Device-related infections. AIGIS(RX) antibacterial envelope vs. pacing device without AIGIS(RX) was evaluated on Recovery of viable bacteria by swabbing and sonication at 7 days. The AIGIS(RX) antibacterial envelope prevented device-related infections in a rabbit model, with no pathogens recovered compared to infection in 100% of control samples.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: