The Importance of International Medical Graduates in the United States

Ideas and Opinions6 June 2017The Importance of International Medical Graduates in the United StatesFREEWilliam W. Pinsky, MDWilliam W. Pinsky, MDFrom Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/M17-0505 SectionsAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail The future supply of physicians in the United States will not be adequate to meet the country's health care needs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has made significant progress in offering health care to the previously uninsured (1). In doing so, however, it has highlighted access issues and uncovered the need for a larger health care workforce. Although the number of U.S. medical schools has increased recently and many established programs have expanded enrollment, the workforce has not yet been augmented substantially, because the education cycle of fully trained practitioners takes many years. For decades, internationally educated physicians have come to the United States to complete their training. In addition to caring for patients across the United States during their training, many of these physicians stay in the country permanently and enter the U.S. health care workforce. Internationally educated physicians currently account for approximately one fourth of the practicing physician workforce and will continue to play a critical role in the delivery of health care services (2). Any disruption to this flow of international medical graduates (IMGs) will have a negative effect on patient care. This commentary discusses the current vetting process for IMGs and outlines the importance of these physicians in delivering quality health care in the United States and their subsequent contribution to the country's safety.To be eligible to enter accredited U.S. graduate medical education (GME) programs, IMGs first must be certified by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG). The vetting procedure, which includes the primary source verification of medical school credentials and requires the candidate to pass the first 2 steps of the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination, is quite rigorous. The entire process, from initial application to certification, takes an average of 3 years to complete. Historically, just over 60% of applicants who take an examination required for ECFMG certification complete the certfication process. Only those who are qualified and truly committed to obtaining GME training in the United States attain ECFMG certification. Even then, obtaining a GME position is not guaranteed. During the past 5 years, the ECFMG certified approximately 10 000 IMGs per year. In 2016, only 6638 (51.9%) of 12 790 IMGs participating in the National Resident Matching Program were placed in first-year positions (3). Without GME training (at least 3 years in most jurisdictions), an IMG is not eligible to obtain an unrestricted license to practice medicine in the United States. The ECFMG certification process, combined with the competitive nature of residency selection and strict state licensure rules, ensures that only high-quality, carefully screened IMGs enter the U.S. workforce.International medical graduates come to the United States for many reasons, including the desire to engage in care that may not be available in their home countries because of resource constraints. Except for U.S. citizens and permanent residents, IMGs who seek entry into the United States for GME must obtain a visa that permits clinical training to provide medical services. Although several visa types are available (such as the H-1B for temporary workers in specialty occupations), one of the most common types for IMGs is the J-1 visa. The ECFMG is authorized by the U.S. Department of State to sponsor foreign national physicians for the J-1 visa. In addition to having a valid ECFMG certificate and meeting other eligibility criteria (4), a J-1 visa holder is required, upon completion of U.S. training, to return to his or her home country for 2 years to transmit the knowledge he or she gained in the United States. Although pathways exist for staying in the United States after training (J-1 visa waivers are available for service in underserved areas), changes in immigration policy might limit bilateral knowledge transfer between the United States and other countries. From a global education perspective, these restrictions also might diminish the perceived benefit of U.S.-based GME and encourage highly educated medical school graduates to seek postgraduate opportunities elsewhere.Published studies suggest that patient outcomes are at least equivalent, if not better, for persons treated by IMGs (5). Investigations also have shown that physician–patient concordance based on ethnicity, languages spoken, and other demographic variables improves access to care for underserved minorities (6). Because the U.S. patient population is becoming more heterogeneous, having a diverse provider workforce is logical (7). In 2016, the ECFMG issued certificates to citizens of 154 countries. In addition to providing high-quality care, IMGs add much-needed diversity to the U.S. physician workforce.According to the 2016 American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, 897 783 physicians are practicing in the United States, 206 030 (23%) of whom did not graduate from a U.S. or Canadian medical school. Nearly 30 000 IMG residents are currently in training, representing almost one fourth of all trainees. Although IMGs enter many different specialties, internal medicine is by far the most common. In 2016, on the basis of self-designated practice specialty, approximately 25% of all active physicians in the United States were internists. Within this group (n = 226 183), 36% (n = 81 456) were IMGs. If the role of IMGs in U.S. health care diminishes, IMG-dependent internal medicine programs, including subspecialty fellowships, likely will be the most affected.During the past decade, calls have been made for the United States to train its own physicians and stop relying on economically underdeveloped nations to augment the workforce (8). From the perspectives of both “brain drain” and workforce cost to underdeveloped nations, this discussion has persisted. However, from a policy perspective, the pathway to self-sufficiency is not that clear. Many international medical schools purposefully educate physicians for foreign markets. From the workforce perspective of the nation to which they immigrate, they may be considered to represent “brain gain.” Finally, although many efforts have been made to encourage U.S. medical students to enter primary care disciplines or to practice in rural or remote areas of the country, their success has been supported by the results of relatively small-scale studies (9). Therefore, IMGs still tend to fill the practice gaps left by U.S. graduates (10). If the proportion of IMGs decreases in the future and U.S. graduates, regardless of increases in their numbers, do not choose careers in certain specialties or practice in underserved areas, patient care may suffer.The future composition of the U.S. physician workforce clearly will depend on IMGs. Because access to health care depends on an adequate supply of high-quality practitioners, preserving the ability of IMGs to compete for training positions in the United States is extremely important.References1. Obama BH. Repealing the ACA without a replacement—the risks to American health care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:297-9. [PMID: 28058966] doi:10.1056/NEJMp1616577 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Mullan F, Salsberg E, Weider K. Why a GME squeeze is unlikely. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2397-9. [PMID: 26536521] doi:10.1056/NEJMp1511707 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. National Resident Matching Program. Results and Data: 2016 Main Residency Match. Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program; 2016. Google Scholar4. Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. ECFMG certification fact sheet. Accessed at www.ecfmg.org/forms/certfact.pdf on 21 February 2017. Google Scholar5. Norcini JJ, Boulet JR, Dauphinee WD, Opalek A, Krantz ID, Anderson ST. Evaluating the quality of care provided by graduates of international medical schools. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:1461-8. [PMID: 20679648] doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0222 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. American College of Physicians. The Role of International Medical Graduates in the U.S. Physician Workforce. Philadelphia: American Coll Physicians; 2005. Google Scholar7. Norcini JJ, vanZanten M, Boulet JR. The contribution of international medical graduates to diversity in the U.S. physician workforce: graduate medical education. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008;19:493-9. [PMID: 18469420] doi:10.1353/hpu.0.0015 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Mandel J. Counterpoint: should the United States provide postgraduate training to international medical graduates? No [Editorial]. Chest. 2016;149:895-7. [PMID: 27055694] doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.01.009 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Rabinowitz HK, Petterson S, Boulger JG, Hunsaker ML, Diamond JJ, Markham FW, et al. Medical school rural programs: a comparison with international medical graduates in addressing state-level rural family physician and primary care supply. Acad Med. 2012;87:488-92. [PMID: 22361802] doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182488b19 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Hing E, Lin S. Role of international medical graduates providing office-based medical care: United States, 2005–2006. NCHS data brief no 13. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2009. Google Scholar Comments0 CommentsSign In to Submit A Comment Russell Bellnone14 June 2017 IMGs working in the US The US has more physicians than any other country. Physicians who leave their home countries to work in the US cost the health of their home countries more than they contribute to the health of Americans. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: From Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Disclosures: Author has disclosed no conflicts of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M17-0505.Corresponding Author: William W. Pinsky, MD, Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, 3624 Market Street, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104; e-mail, [email protected]org.Author Contributions: Conception and design: W.W. Pinsky.Analysis and interpretation of the data: W.W. Pinsky.Drafting of the article: W.W. Pinsky.Critical revision for important intellectual content: W.W. Pinsky.Final approval of the article: W.W. Pinsky.Collection and assembly of data: W.W. Pinsky.This article was published at Annals.org on 7 March 2017. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoAnnals On Call - The Importance of International Medical Graduates Robert M. Centor , George M. Abraham , and Anupam B. Jena Metrics Cited byAltruism or nationalism? Exploring global discourses of medical school regulationThe US Residency Selection Process After the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Pass/Fail Change: Overview for Applicants and EducatorsBias Against International Medical Graduates in the Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Recruitment Process: Findings From a Nationwide Survey of Fellowship Program DirectorsInternational Medical Graduates in the United States Psychiatry WorkforceWe want to help: ethical challenges of medical migration and brain waste during a pandemicThe Health Care Labor ForceInternational Medical Graduate Resident Wellness: Examining Qualitative Data From J-1 Visa Physician RecipientsDisaggregating inequalities in the career outcomes of international medical graduates in the United StatesDemographics and distribution of australia's medical immigrant workforceMedical School Accreditation Factors Associated With Certification by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG): A 10-Year International StudyDirect and Indirect Effects of Restrictive US Immigration Policies on Pharmacy EducationThe case for refugee physicians: Forced migration of International Medical Graduates in the 21st centuryInternational Medical Graduates (IMGs) and the Types of IMGsInternational Medical Graduates in the Pediatric Workforce in the United StatesAddressing the rheumatology workforce shortage: A multifaceted approachPrevalence of International Medical Graduates From Muslim-Majority Nations in the US Physician Workforce From 2009 to 2019International Medical Graduates in Nephrology: A Guide for Trainees and ProgramsConsequences of coronavirus disease 2019 on international medical graduates and students applying to residencies in the United StatesThe Path to U.S. Neurosurgical Residency for Foreign Medical Graduates: Trends from a Decade 2007–2017The synergy of diversity in cardiovascular researchAmerican Cleft-Palate Craniofacial Association Annual Meeting: International Medical Graduate’s Perspective as a First-Time AttendeeSupporting the Integration of Refugee and Asylum Seeking Physicians Into the US Health Care SystemExamining the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates Announcement Requiring Medical School Accreditation Beginning in 2023The More Doctors Program in remote areas: the experience of the Special Supervision Group in Pará, BrazilProportion of Non–US-Born and Noncitizen Health Care Professionals in the United States in 2016The US Training System for Physicians—Need for Deeper AnalysisInternational Medical Graduates in Nephrology: Roles, Rules, and Future RisksTrends of international medical graduates in surgical and non-surgical residency programs in the USInternational Medical Graduates in the US Physician Workforce and Graduate Medical Education: Current and Historical TrendsInternational Medical Graduates and the American Health Care SystemU.S. Immigration Policy and American Medical Research: The Scientific Contributions of Foreign Medical GraduatesDhruv Khullar, MD, MPP, Daniel M. Blumenthal, MD, MBA, Andrew R. Olenski, BS, and Anupam B. Jena, MD, PhDDenying International Medical Graduates Entry to the United States: A Loss at Both EndsImpactos probables de la reforma migratoria estadounidense: algunos escenarios para la reumatología mexicanaProbable Impacts of United States Immigration Reform: Some Scenarios for Mexican Rheumatology 6 June 2017Volume 166, Issue 11Page: 840-841KeywordsBrainForecastingGraduate medical educationHealth careHealth care qualityMedical servicesPatientsRural areasSafetySub-specialty care ePublished: 7 March 2017 Issue Published: 6 June 2017 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2017 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...