Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
On the basis of fatigue data derived from a large number of experiments, the load progression methods of Locati and Prot as well as a method operating on a thermometric basis have been comparatively evaluated in an experimental and analytical (statistical) study. The last-named thermo-method can provide useful estimates for a fatigue limit corresponding with ca. 0 to 5% probability of fracture with only 1 to 3 experiments. The Prot-method, set up and evaluated in a certain way, provides a useful estimate of the fatigue limit and, additionally, an approximate indication of the width of the transition range of the corresponding Wöhler-type tests after experiments on not less than about ten specimens. The load progression, contrary to the original Prot-concept, must not necessarily be applied in a continuous mode, but can occur stepwise with increments Δσ smaller than ca. 15 Nm-2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dengel et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: