Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The small-strain shear modulus depends on stress in uncemented soils. In effect, the shear-wave velocity, which is often used to calculate shear stiffness, follows a power equation with the mean effective stress in the polarization plane Vs=α(σm′/1 kPa)β, where the α factor is the velocity at 1 kPa, and the β exponent captures the velocity sensitivity to the state of stress. The small-strain shear stiffness, or velocity, is a constant-fabric measurement at a given state of stress. However, parameters α and β are determined by fitting the power equation to velocity measurements conducted at different effective stress levels, so changes in both contact stiffness and soil fabric are inherently involved. Therefore, the α and β parameters should be linked to soil compressibility CC. Compiled experimental results show that the α factor decreases and the β exponent increases as soil compressibility CC increases, and there is a robust inverse relationship between α and β for all sediments: β≈0.73−0.27log[α/(m/s)]. Velocity data for a jointed rock mass show similar trends, including a power-type stress-dependent velocity and inverse correlation between α and β; however, the α-β trend for jointed rocks plots above the trend for soils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cha et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: