Key result
High-fat, high-fructose diets most closely recapitulate the human phenotype of NAFLD, while genetic models implicate adipogenesis and innate immunity in disease progression.
Why the study?
Animal models are key for translational research, but consensus is often lacking on which model is optimal for a particular disease.
Systematic Review (n=4,540)
High-fat, high-fructose diets are the optimal rodent models for recapitulating human NAFLD, while genetic models highlight the role of adipogenesis and innate immunity.
Rodent NAFLD models remain highly heterogeneous; leaves open optimal model selection and translational validity to humans.
Summary Animal models of human disease are a key component of translational research and yet there is often no consensus on which model is optimal for a particular disease. Here, we generated a database of 3,920 rodent models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Study designs were highly heterogeneous therefore few models had been cited more than once. Analysis of genetic models provided evidence for the role of adipose dysfunction and perturbation of the innate immune system in the progression of NAFLD. We identified that high-fat, high-fructose diets most closely recapitulate the human phenotype of NAFLD. There was substantial variability in the nomenclature of animal models; a consensus on terminology of specialist diets is needed. More broadly, this analysis demonstrates the variability in preclinical study design, which has implications for the reproducibility of in vivo experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Im et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (n=4,540). Rodent models of NAFLD was evaluated on Phenotypic similarity to human NAFLD and genetic pathway enrichment. High-fat, high-fructose diets most closely recapitulate the human phenotype of NAFLD, while genetic models implicate adipogenesis and innate immunity in disease progression.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: