Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The action of Ba(++) on membrane potential (E(m)) and resistance (R(m)) of frog (R. pipiens) sartorius fibers was studied. In normal Cl(-) Ringer's, Ba(++) (<9 mM) did not depolarize or induce contractions, but increased R(m) slightly above the control value of 3.8 +/- 0.6 K ohm-cm(2). In Cl(-)-free Ringer's (methane sulfonate) R(m) was 28.8 +/- 2.8 K ohm-cm(2), and low concentrations of Ba(++) (0.05-5.0 mM) depolarized and induced spontaneous contractions (fibrillation), even in tetrodotoxin. To stop disturbance of the microelectrodes, contractions were prevented by using two Cl(-)-free solutions: (a) twice hypertonic with sucrose (230 mM), or (b) high K(+) (83 mM) partially replacing Na(+). In the hypertonic solution, the fiber diameters decreased, E(m) increased slightly, and R(m) decreased to 9.0 +/- 0.6 K ohm-cm(2) (perhaps due to swelling of sarcotubules). Ba(++) (0.5 mM) rapidly increased R(m) to 31.3 +/- 3.8, decreased E(m) (e.g., to -30 mv), and induced spontaneous "action potentials;" Sr(++) had no effect. In the high K(+) solution, the fibers were nearly completely depolarized, and R(m) was decreased markedly to 1.5 +/- 0.2 K ohm-cm(2); Ba(++) increased R(m) to 6.7 +/- 0.5 K ohm-cm(2). The Ba(++) actions usually began within 0.5 min and reached a maximum within 5 min. Addition of SO(4) (=), to precipitate the Ba(++), rapidly reversed the increase in R(m). Ba(++) must act by decreasing K(+) conductance (g(K)). In Cl(-) Ringer's, the high g(Cl)/g(K) ratio masked the effect of Ba(++) on g(K). Thus, small concentrations of Ba(++) specifically and rapidly decrease g(K).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sperelakis et al. (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: