Key result
The initial 30 days of treatment with newly prescribed dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or pioglitazone was associated with a significantly increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HR 1.91) compared to the subsequent 31 to 360 days.
Why the study?
Do newly prescribed sitagliptin, vildagliptin, or pioglitazone increase the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with diabetes?
Cohort (n=935,519)
Do newly prescribed sitagliptin, vildagliptin, or pioglitazone increase the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.91 (95% CI 1.63–2.22)
Absolute Event Rate: 222.4% vs 116.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
In a large Korean cohort, newly prescribed sitagliptin, vildagliptin, and pioglitazone were all associated with a nearly twofold increased risk of heart failure hospitalization during the first 30 days of treatment compared to the subsequent 11 months.
DPP4i use was associated with HF hospitalization risk; leaves open causality versus confounding and requires prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: We assessed the association of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) with hospitalization for heart failure (HF) using the Korean Health Insurance claims database. METHODS: We collected data on newly prescribed sitagliptin, vildagliptin, and pioglitazone between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2012 (mean follow-up of 336.8 days) to 935,519 patients with diabetes (518,614 males and 416,905 females) aged 40 to 79 years (mean age of 59.4 years). RESULTS: During the study, 998 patients were hospitalized for primary HF (115.7 per 100,000 patient-years). The incidence rate of hospitalization for HF was 117.7 per 100,000 per patient-years among patients on pioglitazone, 105.7 for sitagliptin, and 135.8 for vildagliptin. The hospitalization rate for HF was greatest in the first 30 days after starting the medication, which corresponded to a significantly higher incidence at days 0 to 30 compared with days 31 to 360 for all three drugs. The hazard ratios were 1.85 (pioglitazone), 2.00 (sitagliptin), and 1.79 (vildagliptin). The incidence of hospitalization for HF did not differ between the drugs for any time period. CONCLUSION: This study showed an increase in hospitalization for HF in the initial 30 days of the DPP4i and pioglitazone compared with the subsequent follow-up period. However, the differences between the drugs were not significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suh et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=935,519). Newly prescribed dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, vildagliptin) or pioglitazone (initial 30 days) vs. Subsequent follow-up period (days 31 to 360) was evaluated on Hospitalization for heart failure (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.63-2.22, p=<0.001). The initial 30 days of treatment with newly prescribed dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or pioglitazone was associated with a significantly increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HR 1.91) compared to the subsequent 31 to 360 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: