The paper gives an account of the meaning of subjunctive conditionals according to which the past tense receives a modal interpretation. The view allows the worlds of the antecedent to include the world of the context of utterance, and thus it avoids a problem pointed out by Mackay (2015) for previous modal views of the past tense in subjunctive conditionals. I argue that it also explains a variety of facts about the relationship among subjunctive morphology, counterfactuality, and presupposition. EARLY ACCESS
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. F. G. Mackay (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: