BACKGROUND: Inflammation is thought to contribute to initiation and aggravation of atherosclerosis through a process predominantly mediated by adhesion molecules. The aims of this study were to investigate the association between the concentrations of circulating soluble intercellular (sICAM-1) and vascular cellular (sVCAM-1) adhesion molecules and clinical outcome, and to evaluate the effect of antihypertensive drugs on sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 concentrations in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. METHODS: We prospectively investigated 310 (191 males) incident ESRD patients, 53+/-12 years old, shortly before the start of renal replacement therapy. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 6.4 (range 0.8-16.5) ml/min/1.73 m(2). Plasma sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Survival was determined from the day of examination, with a mean follow-up period of 39 (range 1-123) months. RESULTS: In non-adjusted analysis, high sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 levels were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular (P<0.001) mortality. After adjusting for age, gender, diabetes mellitus, serum cholesterol, C-reactive protein (CRP), subjective global assessment and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), the association between high sICAM-1 and mortality remained significant for all-cause (HR 1.9; CI 1.2-2.9, P = 0.004) and cardiovascular (HR 1.8; CI 1.1-3.1, P = 0.02) mortality, and a high sVCAM-1 was associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.7; CI 1.04-2.7, P = 0.03). Furthermore, the concentration of sICAM-1, but not sVCAM-1, was lower in patients receiving ACEI/ARB (254+/-83 vs 275+/-92 ng/ml; P<0.05) or patients receiving calcium channel blockers (CCB, 251+/-75 vs 273+/-95 ng/ml; P<0.05) than in non-users. CONCLUSIONS: In ESRD patients, sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 are independent predictors of all cause and cardiovascular death. The use of ACEI/ARB or CCB was associated with decreased concentrations of soluble adhesion molecules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suliman et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: