Degranulation of neutrophils involves the differential regulation of the exocytosis of at least two populations of granules. Low molecular weight GTP-binding proteins (LMW-GBPs) have been implicated in the regulation of vesicular traffic in the secretory pathways of several types of cells. In the present study we identify distinct subsets of LMW-GBPs associated with the membranes of neutrophil-specific and azurophilic granules. Ninety-four percent of total [35S]guanosine 5'-(3-O-thio)triphosphate (GTP gamma S) binding activity was equally distributed between the plasma membrane and cytosol with the remaining 6% localized in the granules. In contrast, the cytosol contained only 10% of the total GTPase activity while the specific granules accounted for 13%. [alpha-32P]GTP binding to proteins transferred to nitrocellulose revealed LMW-GBPs in all fractions except the azurophilic granules. The specific granules contained three out of four bands which were found in the plasma membrane; these ranged from 20 to 23 kDa and all were resistant to alkaline extraction. Photoaffinity labeling with [alpha-32P]8-azido-GTP in the presence of micromolar Al3+ identified proteins of 25 and 26 kDa unique to azurophilic granules; these could not be labeled with [alpha-32P]8-azido-ATP and could be extracted by acidic but not alkaline pH. Botulinum C3-mediated [32P]ADP-ribosylation identified proteins of 16, 20, and 24 kDa both in plasma membranes and those of specific granules. An anti-ras monoclonal antibody, 142-24E5, recognized a 20-kDa protein localized to the plasma and specific granule membranes which could not be extracted by alkaline pH, was not a substrate for botulinum C3 ADP-ribosyltransferase, and was translocated from specific granules to plasma membrane after exposure of neutrophils to phorbol myristate acetate. We conclude that neutrophil-specific and azurophilic granules contain distinct subsets of LMW-GBPs which are uniquely situated to regulate the differential exocytosis of these two compartments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philips et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: