Key result
Heart failure modulated electropharmacological responses in the sinoatrial node, with ivabradine treatment resulting in a significantly higher incidence of action potential block in failing hearts compared to controls (66.7% vs. 0%).
Why the study?
Does heart failure modulate the electropharmacological responses of sinoatrial nodes to ion channel blockers in a rabbit model?
Does heart failure modulate the electropharmacological responses of sinoatrial nodes to ion channel blockers in a rabbit model?
Heart failure alters the expression of key ion channels in the sinoatrial node, increasing its susceptibility to action potential block when exposed to certain anti-arrhythmic drugs like ivabradine.
The impact of heart failure (HF) on sinoatrial node (SAN) channel regulation and electropharmacological responses has remained elusive. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of HF on the electrical activity of SANs with and without pharmacological interventions. Action potentials (APs) were recorded in isolated SANs from normal rabbits (control) and those with HF (rapid ventricular pacing for 4 weeks) prior to and after administration of a funny current blocker (ivabradine; 0.1, 0.3, 3 or 10 µM), a calmodulin kinase II inhibitor (KN‑93; 0.3 or 3 µM), a sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release inhibitor (ryanodine; 0.3 or 3 µM), a sodium current inhibitor (tetrodotoxin; 1, 3 or 10 µM) and a late sodium current inhibitor (ranolazine; 10 µM). Western blot analysis was used to investigate the protein expression in SANs from normal rabbits and those with HF. Control SANs had a higher beating rate than SANs from rabbits with HF (2.3±0.1 vs. 1.5±0.1 Hz; P<0.001). Similarly, ivabradine (10 µM), KN‑93 (3 µM), ranolazine (10 µM) and ryanodine (3 µM) decreased the beating rates of SANs in the control (n=6) and HF (n=6) groups. Ivabradine treatment resulted in a higher incidence of AP block in HF vs. control SANs (66.7 vs. 0%; P<0.05). Tetrodotoxin (1, 3 or 10 µM) decreased the beating rate to a higher extent in SANs from rabbits with HF than in those from control rabbits and induced a higher incidence of AP block (66.7 vs. 0%; P<0.05). Furthermore, SANs from rabbits with HF had higher protein levels of phospholamban (PLB) and lower levels of hyperpolarization‑activated cyclic nucleotide‑gated potassium channel 4, ryanodine receptor and phosphorylated PLB than control SANs. In conclusion, HF modulates electropharmacological responses in the SAN by channel regulation, which may result in SAN dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2016) studied Heart failure (n=12). Rapid ventricular pacing (Heart failure model) vs. Unpaced normal rabbits (control) was evaluated on Incidence of action potential block with ivabradine treatment (p=<0.05). Heart failure modulated electropharmacological responses in the sinoatrial node, with ivabradine treatment resulting in a significantly higher incidence of action potential block in failing hearts compared to controls (66.7% vs. 0%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: