Key result
Severe secondary mitral regurgitation is associated with more impaired LV constructive work but lower wasted work and better work efficiency compared to mild secondary mitral regurgitation.
Why the study?
Assessing LV function in SMR is challenging because LVEF overlooks blood flow direction and LV GLS does not incorporate afterload.
How do left ventricular myocardial work components differ across varying grades of secondary mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=378)
How do left ventricular myocardial work components differ across varying grades of secondary mitral regurgitation?
In patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation, despite more impaired LVEF and GLS, myocardial work efficiency is paradoxically preserved due to lower wasted work from pumping into the low-pressure left atrium.
May not yet inform secondary MR management; hypothesis-generating for myocardial work indices and requires prospective validation.
Background Assessment of left ventricular (LV) function in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) remains challenging because LV ejection fraction (LVEF) reflects changes in LV volume without taking into account the direction of the blood flow. LV global longitudinal strain better reflects active LV myocardial deformation but does not incorporate afterload. LV myocardial work derived from pressure-strain loops integrates speckle tracking echocardiography with non-invasive blood pressure measurement. Purpose To evaluate LV myocardial work components to better characterize LV function in patients with SMR. Methods 378 patients (72% men, median age 68 [range 60 to 74 years]) with various grades of SMR were retrospectively analysed. LV myocardial constructive work, wasted work and work efficiency were measured with speckle tracking echocardiography. Results 145 patients had mild SMR, 130 moderate SMR and 103 severe SMR. Patients with severe SMR had larger LV volumes, lower LVEF and more impaired LV GLS (Table 1). While LV constructive work was more impaired in patients with severe SMR, wasted work was lower as compared to mild SMR (Table 1). Consequently, patients with severe SMR had better myocardial work efficiency than patients with mild MR. This could reflect, the regurgitant volume which is pumped into a low pressure chamber (the left atrium) resulting in less myocardial wasted work and preservation of myocardial efficiency. Conclusion In patients with severe SMR, LVEF, LV GLS and myocardial constructive work are more impaired when compared to mild SMR. However, myocardial wasted work is lower, resulting in higher better LV myocardial work efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yedidya et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Secondary mitral regurgitation (n=378). Severe secondary mitral regurgitation vs. Mild secondary mitral regurgitation was evaluated on LV myocardial work components (constructive work, wasted work, work efficiency). Severe secondary mitral regurgitation is associated with more impaired LV constructive work but lower wasted work and better work efficiency compared to mild secondary mitral regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: