Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: Noise exposure limit is one of the critical measures to prevent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This review aimed to review the progress and recommendations for developing occupational exposure limits (OELs) for workplace noise. Methods: A systematic review was used. Thirty-eight national or international organizations' noise exposure standards (including OEL) and laws, regulations, and guidelines for noise exposure control were analyzed. Articles on recommendations for revising noise OEL standards between 2000 and 2023 were selected. Results: ) for impulsive noise have been incorporated into the OELs. Countries developed noise risk management measures based on OELs, action levels (ALs), and exposure risk ratio or classification. The risk of co-exposure to noise and ototoxic organic substances and the effects of noise on susceptible populations were concerns in EU country standards. Scholars suggested revising the existing noise exposure standards based on noise's temporal structure (expressed by kurtosis), effective noise level, impulsive noise OEL, action level, and key factors of risk assessment. Developing noise OEL standards should consider the co-exposure of noise and ototoxic substances, HPD's noise attenuation, susceptible groups, and noise's temporal structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: