Key result
Breakfast consumption and skipping both offer viable options for managing cardiometabolic risk factors.
Review reveals that both breakfast consumption and breakfast skipping offer cardiometabolic benefits in varied populations, indicating the importance of personalized dietary recommendations.
Breakfast consumption is generally considered a health-promoting habit for cardiometabolism, particularly with regard to chrononutrition. Glucose uptake is enhanced by proper insulin secretion triggered by the pancreatic clock, averting metabolic dysregulation related to insulin resistance. Breakfast skipping, in turn, is often considered a behaviour detrimental to health, in part due to putative inverse metabolic actions compared to breakfast consumption, such that breakfast skipping may promote circadian desynchrony. However, most ill health concerns about breakfast skipping are inferred from observational research, and recent well-controlled randomized clinical trials have shown benefits of breakfast skipping for cardiovascular risk factors. Accordingly, this review describes the effects of breakfast consumption versus breakfast skipping on cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure and glycaemic and lipid indices). In addition, the view of breakfast consumption as an opportunity for functional food ingestion is considered to provide further insights into decision-making practice. Collectively, both breakfast consumption and breakfast skipping can be considered viable habits, but they depend on individual preferences, planning, and the specific foods being consumed or omitted. When consumed, breakfast should consist primarily of functional foods typical for this meal (e.g., eggs, dairy products, nuts, fruits, whole grains, coffee, tea, etc.). While breakfast consumption aligns with chrononutrition principles, breakfast skipping can contribute to a calorie deficit over time, which has the potential for widespread cardiometabolic benefits for patients with overweight/obesity. The concepts and practical considerations discussed in the present review may aid health care personnel in personalising breakfast consumption recommendations for diverse patient populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2023) conducted a review in Cardiometabolic risk. Breakfast consumption vs. Breakfast skipping was evaluated on Cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, glycaemic and lipid indices). Breakfast consumption and breakfast skipping are both viable habits for managing cardiometabolic risk factors, depending on individual preferences, planning, and functional food choices.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: