This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: = 443) with unmet mental health needs. METHODS: Logistic regression tested which perceived practical, attitudinal, and stigma-related barriers predicted service use. Subgroup analyses targeted screen-positives for anxiety (GAD-7) and/or depression (PHQ-9). RESULTS: Reduced service use was linked to attitudinal barriers, minimizing problems (OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.98) and difficulty discussing problems (OR = 0.59; CI = 0.38-0.91), especially among screen positives for the latter (OR = 0.49; CI = 0.27-0.89); practical barriers, uncertainty about how to get help (OR = 0.64; CI = 0.42-0.97) and time limitations (OR = 0.66; CI = 0.44-0.98), especially in screen-positives for both (OR = 0.46; CI = 0.26-0.79; OR = 0.47; CI = 0.27-0.79); and stigma-related barriers, feeling ashamed (OR = 0.63; CI = 0.40-0.98), appearing weak (OR = 0.65; CI = 0.42-0.98), and friends' reactions (OR = 0.58; CI = 0.38-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple perceived barriers were associated with a reduced likelihood of accessing university mental health services. Developing mental health literacy and streamlined pathways may improve timely support access for students with unmet needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dale et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: