A simple GCM based on a primitive equation model with empirically derived time-independent forcing is used to make forecasts in the extended to seasonal range. The results are analyzed in terms of the response to a midlatitude Pacific sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA), represented here by a heating perturbation. A set of 90-day, 30-member ensemble forecasts is made with 54 widely differing initial conditions, both with and without the SSTA. The development of the response, defined as the difference between ensemble means, is split into three 30-day averages: month 1, month 2, and month 3. During month 1, ensemble members separate, and the local response and remote teleconnections are established. The local response is not very sensitive to the initial condition. In month 2, the extended range, the responses are relatively strong and vary greatly from one initial condition to another. However, a linear analysis reveals that large variations in the response do not correlate strongly with large variations in the initial condition. The initial perturbations required to generate the observed variations in the response are relatively small, and may be difficult to isolate in a real forecasting situation. In month 3, the seasonal range, variations between responses are much smaller. The initial condition loses its influence and the responses all start to resemble the equilibrium response discussed in Part I.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hall et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: