Experimental study demonstrates 97% deception detection accuracy using an optimized multimodal Random Forest model in 49 subjects, highlighting potential for real-time investigation tools.
Deception detection is considered a concern for all individuals in their everyday lives, as it greatly affects human interactions. While multiple automatic lie detection systems exist, their accuracy still needs to be improved. Additionally, the lack of adequate and realistic datasets hinders the development of reliable systems. This paper presents a new multimodal dataset with physiological data (heart rate, galvanic skin response, and body temperature), in addition to demographic data (age, weight, and height). The presented dataset was collected from 49 unique subjects. Moreover, this paper presents a polygraph-based lie detection system utilizing multimodal sensor fusion. Different machine learning algorithms are used and evaluated. Random Forest has achieved an accuracy of 97%, outperforming Logistic Regression (58%), Support Vector Machine (58% with perfect recall of 1.00), and k-Nearest Neighbor (83%). The model shows excellent precision and recall (0.97 each), making it effective for applications such as criminal investigations. With a computation time of 0.06 s, Random Forest has proven to be efficient for real-time use. Additionally, a robust k-fold cross-validation procedure was conducted, combined with Grid Search and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for hyperparameter tuning, which substantially reduced the gap between training and validation accuracies from several percentage points to under 1%, underscoring the model’s enhanced generalization and reliability in real-world scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shalash et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: