Key result
Long-term swimming exercise for 24 weeks did not modulate protein expressions of Akt, p-Akt, eNOS, p-eNOS, and PECAM-1 in healthy mice.
Why the study?
Does long-term swimming exercise modulate Akt-dependent eNOS phosphorylation in healthy mice?
Does long-term swimming exercise modulate Akt-dependent eNOS phosphorylation in healthy mice?
Long-term swimming exercise does not modulate Akt-dependent eNOS phosphorylation in healthy mice, suggesting this pathway may not be the primary molecular adaptation to exercise in the absence of cardiovascular disease.
Questions extension of Akt/eNOS mechanism beyond CAD; leaves open its role in healthy models.
Molecular mechanisms by which exercise exerts cardiovascular benefits are poorly understood. Exercise-induced increase of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) phosphorylation through the protein kinase Akt has been shown to be a key mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of exercise in coronary artery disease patients. We examined whether this protective pathway might also be activated in long-term-exercised healthy mice. C57BL/6 wild-type mice swam for 24 weeks. A group of sedentary animals were used as controls. Aortic levels of total protein kinase Akt (protein kinase B), phosphorylated Akt at ser473 (p-Akt), total eNOS, phosphorylated eNOS at Ser1177 (p-eNOS), and PECAM-1 (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1) were assessed by Western blotting. Protein expressions of Akt, p-Akt, eNOS, p-eNOS, and PECAM-1 were not modulated by 24 weeks of exercise. The Akt-dependent eNOS phosphorylation did not seem to be a primary molecular adaptation in response to long-term exercise in healthy mice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pellegrin et al. (2010) studied Healthy. Swimming exercise vs. Sedentary animals was evaluated on Protein expressions of Akt, p-Akt, eNOS, p-eNOS, and PECAM-1. Long-term swimming exercise for 24 weeks did not modulate protein expressions of Akt, p-Akt, eNOS, p-eNOS, and PECAM-1 in healthy mice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: